This week, Shannon talks to MBAKS Product Manager Kevin McDaniel about enrolling in GRIP and this year's GRIP refund—our largest ever.

Enroll by June 15

Reports Confirm Home Building’s Significant Contributions to Washington’s Economy

Two newly released reports from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), commissioned by the Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW), highlight the substantial economic benefits generated by homebuilding across Washington state.

Together, the reports show that residential construction plays a major role in supporting jobs, generating income for residents, and providing critical revenue for state and local governments.

Economic Benefits During Construction

The first report examines the economic activity created during the year homes are built, including job creation, wages, and tax revenue. Using housing production data from the 12-month period ending April 2025 and based on estimates from the Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM), NAHB analyzed the direct and indirect impacts of new residential construction.

These impacts include not only construction-related employment and income, but also the ripple effects as workers and businesses spend earnings throughout the local economy.

For single-family homes, the construction of 14,348 homes generated an estimated one-year local impact of:

• $5.16 billion in income for Washington residents
• $1.25 billion in state and local taxes and other public revenue
• 44,686 jobs statewide
  

For multifamily homes, construction of 32,368 homes generated an estimated:

• $10.81 billion in income for Washington residents
• $2.18 billion in state and local taxes and other public revenue
• 92,916 jobs statewide

These figures reflect both direct construction activity and indirect economic activity driven by household and business spending.

Ongoing, Annual Economic Impacts

The reports also highlight the recurring annual benefits that continue once new homes are occupied. These impacts reflect the economic activity generated as residents live, work, and pay taxes in their communities

The annual recurring impacts of the newly built homes include:

Single-family homes (14,348 units):

• $978 million in income for Washington residents
• $355 million in state and local taxes and revenue
• 10,041 jobs

Multifamily homes (32,368 units):

• $2.17 billion in income for Washington residents
• $702 million in state and local taxes and revenue
• 22,345 jobs

These benefits continue year after year, underscoring how housing availability supports long-term economic vitality across the state.

Comparing Public Costs and Public Benefits

At a more practical level, NAHB’s findings show that every 100 homes built in Washington generate approximately $34 million in income, $7 million in public revenue, and support nearly 300 jobs—illustrating why residential development produces significant returns for both local economies and public budgets.

A separate NAHB analysis compared the public costs of residential development—such as infrastructure, services, and capital investment—to the revenue generated for state and local governments.

The findings show that, from a public finance perspective, residential development more than pays for itself within the first year.

Over a 15-year period, newly built single-family and multifamily homes combined are projected to generate:

• $18.76 billion in cumulative state and local revenue
• Compared to $9.42 billion in total public costs

Over that same period, the homes are expected to generate approximately $9.34 billion in net revenue, effectively doubling the public investment in infrastructure such as roads, schools, and essential services.

A Broad Benefit for Washington Communities

Taken together, the reports reinforce the far-reaching economic value of homebuilding in our state. Residential construction supports jobs, strengthens local economies, and provides a sustainable source of public revenue that helps fund community priorities across the state.

Resources

• The Economic Impact of Home Building in Washington: Income, Jobs and Taxes Generated — NAHB (November 2025)
• The Economic Impact of Home Building in Washington: Comparing Costs to Revenue for State and Local Governments — NAHB (November 2025)
• Homebuilders Offer Relief for State’s Budget Woes — BIAW (December 1, 2025)

On December 11, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)-supported Promoting Efficient Review for Modern Infrastructure Today (PERMIT) Act. The legislation focuses on reforming federal permitting requirements under the Clean Water Act with the goal of reducing delays and uncertainty that can slow housing and infrastructure projects.

The vote moves the bill to the U.S. Senate, where lawmakers will continue debating how to balance environmental protections with the need to build homes and infrastructure more efficiently.

What the PERMIT Act Does

The PERMIT Act is intended to streamline environmental permitting and reduce regulatory uncertainty that builders and infrastructure providers say contributes to rising costs and project delays. Key provisions of the bill include:

• Clarifying Clean Water Act jurisdiction by redefining “waters of the United States” and codifying exclusions for features such as waste treatment systems, ephemeral streams, and groundwater.

• Extending and improving nationwide permits to provide longer, more predictable authorization timelines.

• Establishing limits on judicial review timelines to reduce prolonged litigation and project delays.

• Addressing backlogs and inefficiencies in the issuance of jurisdictional determinations.

• Restoring a clearer pathway for states to assume control of their own wetlands permitting programs.

Lawmakers also adopted an NAHB-supported amendment on the House floor that would reduce compensatory mitigation costs through targeted, commonsense reforms. The amendment is intended to maintain environmental protections while improving predictability and supporting economic growth.

Supporters argue these reforms will create regulatory certainty, lower development costs, and help accelerate housing and infrastructure production at a time of acute national need.

What Happens Next

With House passage secured, the PERMIT Act now moves to the U.S. Senate, where its future remains uncertain. The legislation is expected to be part of a broader debate over federal permitting reform, infrastructure delivery, and housing affordability. For homebuilders and policymakers focused on reducing costs and delays, the outcome could have meaningful implications for how quickly new housing and infrastructure projects can move from proposal to construction.

For more details, view the NAHB blog or contact Dylan Sluder, State Government Affairs Manager, at MBAKS via 425.451.7920 for additional information.