Seattle Times columnist Jonathan Martin recently wrote a column advocating for adopting impact fees in Seattle, arguing that “growth doesn’t pay for growth.” That statement is simply not true. New development already generates other taxes and fees, such as the REET and sales taxes, which pay for transportation, infrastructure, and other priorities.

Our association is concerned about the effect of any added fee on housing costs, especially in light of our current housing affordability crisis. Housing affordability is a concern throughout our region and while the developer or builder initially pays the impact fee for new construction in jurisdictions that charge these fees, it is almost always added on to the sale price of the home. Any additional fees would likely be passed along to buyers or renters, further driving up home prices and rents at a time when housing costs are already skyrocketing. New homebuyers would be forced to pay for the fee with interest over the life of their mortgage.

The reality is that impact fees disproportionately affect new homebuyers, especially those at or below the median family income. The increasing use of impact fees and the costs that they add to development raises serious concerns about the effect of using impact fees to fund infrastructure will have on the affordability of housing.

Furthermore, impact fees are a one-time-only assessment and will never replace other fees/taxes in being a good, stable source of revenue. The city would be better served if a more stable type of user fee were used.

Visit MBAKS Connect for our full analysis of Seattle’s updated Comprehensive Plan.

On Tuesday, Dec. 16, the Seattle City Council adopted its updated Comprehensive Plan, a key requirement of the state’s Growth Management Act (GMA) that sets the city’s 20-year vision. The plan will guide local decisions related to housing, land use, and other priorities to align with Seattle’s long-term goals and community values.

A key update in the Comprehensive Plan is its alignment with House Bill 1110, enacted by the State Legislature more than two years ago. HB 1110 requires local jurisdictions to allow for a broader spectrum of housing choices, including duplexes, townhomes, stacked flats, courtyard apartments, and cottage housing. The law allows for a minimum of four housing units on all residential lots, and at least six on all residential lots within a quarter mile of major transit. By reducing barriers to housing production near jobs and transit, HB 1110 advances the core principles of GMA while maintaining protections for environmentally sensitive and open spaces.

“Seattle’s adoption of its updated Comprehensive Plan means that the city has taken a major step forward in addressing the housing shortage placing homes out of reach for so many,” said Jerry Hall, executive director of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties (MBAKS). “We commend Seattle for lowering many barriers to housing choices in the city even as we look ahead to persistent challenges that still exist in the work to make housing more attainable for all. MBAKS will continue to focus on offering our expertise regarding how best to facilitate more housing that is attainable for current residents, newcomers, and future generations.”

Reducing Barriers to Housing in Seattle’s Updated Comprehensive Plan

Seattle’s updated Comprehensive Plan removes several long-standing obstacles to housing production and allows for more efficient use of the city’s buildable land. Notably, the plan:

• Invests in accessory dwelling units as a popular housing option.
• Improves use of limited buildable land for housing.
• Addresses the need for housing and trees. 

Persistent Barriers to Housing Options in Seattle’s Updated Comprehensive Plan

Unfortunately, Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan preserves barriers that will continue to drive up the cost of housing for both renters and homeowners.

Under the plan, Seattle’s Department of Construction & Inspections would retain broad subjective discretion when reviewing new housing proposals related to tree canopy management. MBAKS supports the shared goal of maintaining a healthy urban tree canopy but strongly prefers a clearly defined, objective policy framework that provides transparency, predictability, and timely review for applicants.

The plan also relies on arbitrary minimum tree-per-square foot requirements, which further restrict already limited buildable land. These requirements increase the single greatest cost barrier for new housing: the price of land without demonstratable environmental benefit. Homebuilders are already subject to strict regulations that oversee new construction so that our water, air, and soil are appropriately protected. Homebuilders also routinely plant more trees during construction than are removed.

MBAKS members demonstrate their commitment to environmental stewardship by partnering with local jurisdictions through the association’s Planting a Better Tomorrow event.

“While other barriers to housing remain, MBAKS will continue to advocate for policies and partnerships needed to expand Seattle’s housing supply, ensuring everyone has a place to call home,” said Logan Schmidt, MBAKS’s Seattle Government Affairs Manager.

Visit MBAKS Connect for our full analysis of Seattle’s updated Comprehensive Plan.

By Rachel Fausnaught, PrimePay

Revisions to the list of acceptable documents

The Consular Report of Birth Abroad (Form FS-240) has been added to List C. If you’re filling out the Form I-9 online, you will be able to select this form from the dropdown menus. Using e-verify? You can also select Form FS-240 when creating a case for an employee who presents this document for Form I-9.

All the certifications of report of birth issued by the Department of State (Form FS-545, Form DS-1350, and Form FS-240) have been combined into selection C #2 in List C. 

All List C documents except the Social Security card have been renumbered. Example: The employment authorization document issued by the Department of Homeland Security on List C has changed from List C #8 to List C #7.

What to do

Employers can continue using the older version through Sept. 17. On Sept. 18, you must use the revised version. You’ll notice the revision date of 07/17/17 N at the bottom of the form. Storage and retention rules for any previously completed Forms I-9 remain the same. Find more details on that here.

Penalties for noncompliance

Just last year, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nearly doubled fines for violations with Forms I-9.

There is a $216–$2,126 fine per Form I-9 paperwork violation. That’s an increase from $110–$1,100.

For unlawful employment of unauthorized workers, the fine for the first offense increased to $539–$4,313 per worker from $375–$3,200.

For unfair immigration-related practices, specifically document abuse, the fine per individual increased to $110-$1,110. Learn more about the fines and penalties.

Where to find the latest form

It's in PrimePay's resources section. Access the resources and choose the payroll forms tab.

PrimePay is a member of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties. PrimePay empowers small businesses to thrive by offering integrated payroll, HR, and benefits administration with superior support to back it. Learn more at primepay.com.

The original article was published by PrimePay.